CT Scanning of Healthy People Discouraged
The Conference
of Radiation Control Program Directors (CRCPD) discourages patients
without symptoms from obtaining Computed Tomography (CT) Scans until
scientific studies demonstrate that they are effective in reducing
disease or mortality.
The CRCPD passed
a resolution based upon current information on the growing business of
providing CT scans to individuals who are asymptomatic (have no disease
symptoms). CRCPD is a national organization whose primary
membership includes individuals in state and local government who
regulate the use of radioactive material and radiation sources.
The members agree that CT can be a useful diagnostic tool when a person
has signs or symptoms of some particular disease. CT can also be
extremely helpful in determining the extent of some diseases and
monitoring the effects of treatment. However, no scientific
studies have demonstrated that CT screening of individuals without
symptoms provides a greater probability of benefit than harm.
The resolution
indicated that the potential risks of CT scans for an individual
included false positives, false negatives, and increased possibility of
cancer induction from X-ray exposure during the scan. Although these
risks are inherent in any CT scan, there would have been no medical
recommendation to obtain the scan for asymptomatic individuals. A
typical CT examination may only increase the possibility of fatal cancer
by 1 in 2000 compared to the natural incidence in the United States of
about 1 in 5. When not medically indicated, even this small increase in
radiation-associated cancer can become a public health concern if many
individuals obtain CT scans or if an individual obtains numerous CT
scans during their lifetime.
CRCPD members
agreed that they should actively discourage self-referral CT screening
through the application of individual state authority and require all CT
scans be specifically ordered and authorized by a physician after a
medical consultation. In addition, CRCPD supports the application of a
quality assurance program for every CT machine to ensure that good
imaging technique is used to help avoid unnecessary radiation exposure.
|
Like One Hundred X-rays? Study Suggests Many Referring
Physicians Don’t Grasp or Explain to Patients the Radiation Exposure
Involved With CT
By Matthew Robb. This article was in the July 19, 2004 issue
of Radiology Today.
[Link posted
11/12/04]
Whole-body CT
screening article in February 10, 2003 Oncology Times
[Link changed from information discussing the article to the article
itself on 3/20/03.]
CRCPD Survey of CT Screening
[Posted
3/15/03]
>>Background
Information Re Self-Referred Whole-Body Computed Tomography Screening
(by CRCPD H-3 Committee on Medical Practice [Posted
3/15/03]
>>
CRCPD Resolution on CT Scanning
>>
FDA on CT scans
>>
FDA
Brochure on Full-Body Scans, What You Need to Know [a trifold
brochure]
>>
ACR Position on CT Screening
>>NEXT
2000 Protocol for Survey of Computed Tomography
>>February 2001
Q.A.
Collectible:
Computed Tomography Fluoroscopy.
This
Collectible provides a brief description of CT fluoroscopy and lists
important radiation safety inspection objectives.
>>October 1998
Q.A.
Collectible:
Developing a
Technique Chart for a CT SystemCWhy
is it Important?
This collectible includes an example of exposure differences
using different techniques.
>>25
Years of NEXT Trifold
>>Publication: Nationwide Evaluation of X-Ray Trends (NEXT)
Summary of 1990 Computerized Tomography Survey and 1991 Fluoroscopy
Survey, January 1994, CRCPD Publication 94-2 ($25.00).
|